Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RPIA 31/2025

Case between Chengotta Pilakilodiyil Sukumaran vs Tharammal Kunhabdulla et al regarding setting aside ex-parte order

Court
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff - I
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-10-16
Duration
Case Code No.
31
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chengotta Pilakilodiyil Sukumaran is the petitioner seeking to set aside an ex-parte order against him due to his absence caused by a cataract surgery. Tharammal Kunhabdulla and others are the respondents contesting the petition's maintainability.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The application to set aside the ex-parte order was allowed. The petitioner is required to deposit costs of ₹6000 to the respondents within 14 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The petitioner shall deposit ₹6000 as costs to the respondents within 14 days.
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The application to set aside the ex-parte order was allowed. The petitioner is required to deposit costs of ₹6000 to the respondents within 14 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner made out a sufficient cause for his absence due to medical reasons.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner made out a sufficient cause for his absence due to medical reasons.
Supporting Evidence
Considering the rival contentions, this court is of the view that the petitioner has made out a sufficient cause for his absence. The documents produced along with the petition would go to show that petitioner was unable to attend the court.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this application is allowed as follows: The petitioner shall deposit ₹6000 (Rupees Six thousand only) as costs to the respondents within 14 days from the date of this order, failing of which this application will stand dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chengotta Pilakilodiyil Sukumaran
Party Age
77
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tharammal Kunhabdulla (Died)
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tharammal Kunhammed
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tharammal Moidu
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Medical documents regarding surgery
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Jayadeep Singh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Sri. K. B. Sivaramakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition to set aside the ex parte order was allowed.
Evidence:
Considering the rival contentions, this court is of the view that the petitioner has made out a sufficient cause for his absence.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is required to deposit costs to the respondents.
Evidence:
The petitioner shall deposit 6000 (Rupees Six thousand only) as costs to the respondents within 14 days from the date of this order.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Medical Document
Submitted By: Petitioner
Relevance:
The petitioner produced medical documents to explain his absence due to cataract surgery.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
RPIA
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Othandavida Vayalil Ahammed Haji et al vs Kousalya et al regarding Rent Recovery
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Abdul Basheer.A.K et al vs Abdul Sathar regarding delivery of possession.
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Rabiya vs IK Krishnadas et al regarding rent control
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Prajena P.V. vs Subhashini V.P. regarding Rent Control
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Bayaram Veettil Ummayabi et al vs T.V. Zeenath et al regarding Rent Control
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Plaintiff Won