Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.10/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs Usha.S regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
approximately-7 years 7 months
Case Code No.
10
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against Usha.S for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendant failed to repay the loan, leading to the bank recovering the dues amounting to ₹1,65,434/-.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, Canara Bank, allowing them to recover the dues from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹1,65,434/- with 6% interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, Canara Bank, allowing them to recover the dues from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan and the defendant's failure to repay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan and the defendant's failure to repay.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the evidence before this Court, it is found that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree in its favour. The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹1,65,434/- is due from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹1,65,434/- (Rupees One lakh Sixty-five Thousand Four Hundred and Thirty-four only) with 6% interest.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by its Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usha.S
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan application form, Original Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation, Original acknowledgment of debt and security, Bank statement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Sreena L.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sana J.O
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹1,65,434/- with interest.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹1,65,434/- (Rupees One lakh Sixty-five Thousand Four Hundred and Thirty-four only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and her assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (b)The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant and her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan application form under the Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original acknowledgment of debt and security signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Bank statement of the defendant’s loan account certified under the Bankers’ Books Evidence Act.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 01/18/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won