Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.2024/2022

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Marwin Apparels et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-02-18
Duration
approximately-8 years 21 days
Case Code No.
2024
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against M/s Marwin Apparels and two others for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants failed to appear in court to contest the claims, leading to a judgment in favor of the bank.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, awarding them the claimed amount due to default by the defendants on their loan repayment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants shall pay an amount of Rs. 6,92,331/- (Rupees Six lakhs Ninety Two thousand Three hundred and Thirty One only) to the plaintiff jointly and severally with future interest at the rate of 10.50% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, awarding them the claimed amount due to default by the defendants on their loan repayment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case and it is entitled to a decree to realise the amount from the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case and it is entitled to a decree to realise the amount from the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case and it is entitled to a decree to realise the amount from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and defendants shall pay an amount of Rs. 6,92,331/- (Rupees Six lakhs Ninety Two thousand Three hundred and Thirty One only) to the plaintiff jointly and severally with future interest at the rate of 10.50% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Marwin Apparels
Relation
represented by its Proprietor- Anees Mohammed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sandeep Chandra Mohan
Party Age
36
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shameera Rehim
Relation
W/o Anees Mohammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan Application dated 16.01.2017, Composite Hypothecation Agreement dated 24.01.2017, Guarantee Agreement executed by the 1st defendant dated 24.01.2017, Guarantee Agreement executed by the 2nd defendant dated 24.01.2017, Guarantee Agreement executed by the 3rd defendant dated 24.01.2017, Copy of statement of account with certificate dated 19.12.2022.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Prasanth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover an amount of Rs. 6,92,331/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
Thus, the suit is decreed with costs and defendants shall pay an amount of Rs. 6,92,331/- (Rupees Six lakhs Ninety Two thousand Three hundred and Thirty One only) to the plaintiff jointly and severally with future interest at the rate of 10.50% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as part of the evidence to support the plaintiff's case regarding the loan application.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the terms under which the first defendant agreed to secure the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a guarantee agreement executed by the first defendant to ensure loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a guarantee agreement executed by the second defendant to ensure loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a guarantee agreement executed by the third defendant to ensure loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Statement of Account with Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the financial details of the outstanding amount due on the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 01/24/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won