Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 510/2025

Case between Canara Bank vs Mr. Muhammed Sahid. N.V regarding realization of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha T.P
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration
approximately-3 years 5 months
Case Closed
Fri, 12/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Canara Bank seeking repayment from Mr. Muhammed Sahid, the proprietor of M/s Nano Bakes and Cakes, for a loan that was defaulted. The bank alleges that the defendant failed to comply with the repayment terms.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant must pay Canara Bank a total of 6,43,154/- with specific interest rates until realization. The defendant is also directed to pay the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay 6,43,154/- to the plaintiff with an interest at the rate of 7% till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendant must pay Canara Bank a total of 6,43,154/- with specific interest rates until realization. The defendant is also directed to pay the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the default of payments and entitlement to relief.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved the default of payments and entitlement to relief.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint claim of borrowal of the amount, the default of the payments is proved by the affidavit of PW1 and documents No.A1 to A11.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is directed to pay 6,43,154/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Forty Three Thousand One Hundred And Fifty Four Only) to the plaintiff with an interest at the rate of 7% till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Muhammed Sahid. N.V
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sanction Memorandum, Agreement cum Deed of Hypothecation, Letter of undertaking, Cash credit Agreement, Demand Promissory Note, Acknowledgment of Debt and Security, Copy of Lawyer Notice, Termloan Account statement with certification, Cash Credit Loan Account Statement with certification.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Lissy. K. K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay a total amount of 6,43,154/- to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay 6,43,154/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Forty Three Thousand One Hundred And Fifty Four Only) to the plaintiff with an interest at the rate of 7% till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till realization.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant is also directed to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the sanction of the term loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement cum Deed of Hypothication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement providing security for the term loan granted.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter affirming the terms of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement related to the cash credit facility sanctioned.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Promissory note affirming the obligation to repay the cash credit.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Request for Overdraft Facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Request related to additional borrowing requirements.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledge of the debt regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice issued to the defendant regarding the default.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Termloan Account statement with certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of the account detailing the loan and payments.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Cash Credit Loan Account Statement with certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account statement for the cash credit facility.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Mr. Muhammed Sahid. N.V regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Mr. Muhammed Sahid. N.V regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 07/11/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 12/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S Cut Man Gents Beauty Parlour et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Bank et al vs M/s. A J Advisory Services et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank Peruvayal Branch vs Sri.Mohanan.K.K regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Samson @ Louis Samsom regarding loan repayment
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Mr Fahad Rahman P P et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won