Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1830/2022

Case between Canara Bank vs Mohammed Siyad.S regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-08-14
Duration
approximately-3 years 5 days
Case Code No.
1830
Case Closed
Thu, 08/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank, represented by its manager, filed a suit against Mohammed Siyad.S for non-payment of a loan. The defendant failed to appear before the court, leading to an ex parte judgment against him.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding amount due from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹7,46,186/- with 6% interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding amount due from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the outstanding debt and the terms of the loan agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the outstanding debt and the terms of the loan agreement.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹7,46,186/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Forty-Six Thousand One Hundred and Eighty-Six only) is due from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹7,46,186/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Forty-Six Thousand One Hundred and Eighty-six only) with 6% interest.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohammed Siyad.S
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan Application for loans to Micro Small and Medium Enterprises, Original Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation, Original Letter of Undertaking regarding Loans/Advances, Bank statement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.Prasanth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹7,46,186/- with interest from the defendant's assets.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹7,46,186/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Forty-Six Thousand One Hundred and Eighty-six only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (b) The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan application for loans to Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation executed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Letter of Undertaking regarding Loans/Advances executed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Bank statement for the period from 11/08/2020 to 10/08/2021 certified under the Bankers Books Evidence Act.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 06/20/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 08/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won