Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.22/2021

Case between Canara Bank vs Baiju Shamsudheen et al regarding recovery of money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt.Sincy Jacob, Additional Munsiff-II
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-4 years 9 months
Case Code No.
22
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking recovery of loans taken by the defendant, Baiju Shamsudheen, for defaulting on payments. The court examined the evidence and decided in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding loan amounts along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.73,544/- and Rs.3,11,939/- along with interest from the date of decree till realisation.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding loan amounts along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established its case through the testimony of its manager and the documents presented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontroverted testimony of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A11 documents the plaintiff had established his case warranting the grant of reliefs sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit No.22/2021 decreed with costs:- Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.73,544/- (Rupees Seventy Three Thousand Five Hundred and Forty Four only)together with 6% interest from the date of decree till realisation and cost of the suit from the defendant and his assets both movable and immovable.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baiju Shamsudheen
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheena Biju
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application, Pronote, Legal Notice, Statement of Account
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N.R. Rajani
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover Rs.73,544/- from the defendant with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit No.22/2021 decreed with costs:- Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.73,544/- (Rupees Seventy Three Thousand Five Hundred and Forty Four only) together with 6% interest from the date of decree till realisation and cost of the suit from the defendant and his assets both movable and immovable.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover Rs.3,11,939/- from the defendants with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit No. 24/2021 decreed with costs :- Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.3,11,939/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Eleven Thousand Nine Hundred and Thirty Nine only) together with 6% interest from the date of decree till realisation and cost of the suit from the defendants and their assets both movable and immovable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the loan application for the first loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the promissory note executed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the loan application for the vehicle loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the agreement for the vehicle loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the guarantee for the vehicle loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Guarantee covering letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the covering letter for the guarantee.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the loan sanction for the first loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the loan sanction for the vehicle loan.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the legal notice sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the outstanding balance for the first loan.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the outstanding balance for the vehicle loan.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won