Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.475/2025

Case between Canara Bank vs Amal Santhosh regarding Suit for realization of money

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S, Principal Munsiff
Order Date
2025-10-04
Duration
approximately-2 years 5 months
Case Code No.
475
Case Closed
Sat, 10/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against Amal Santhosh for the recovery of a loan amount of ₹54,219/- that remains unpaid. The defendant failed to appear in court, resulting in an ex parte decision.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding loan amount plus interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹54,219/- with 6% interest and costs from the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding loan amount plus interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence produced by the plaintiff sufficiently proved the debt owed by the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence produced by the plaintiff sufficiently proved the debt owed by the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹54,219/-... There is no evidence on record indicating that the defendant has discharged his liability to the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹54,219/- with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Amal Santhosh
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application form under the Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY), Original Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation, Bank statement for the period from 02/03/2024 to 01/03/2025.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Sreena L. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sana J.O
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹54,219 with interest.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹54,219/- (Rupees Fifty-Four Thousand Two Hundred and Nineteen only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of this suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the loan application signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the agreement for the loan taken by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence of the loan account and repayment status.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 05/03/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 10/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won