Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 16/2025

Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs AKHIL . P. T et al regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-09-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking to recover an amount due from the defendants due to non-payment of an educational loan. The defendants defaulted on their loan, leading the bank to file this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of the due amount from the defendants along with interest. The suit was decreed with costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 53,269/- with interest @ 11.25 % per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of the due amount from the defendants along with interest. The suit was decreed with costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendants stands unchallenged and undisputed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
AKHIL . P. T
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
RAVEENDRAN
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
CHANDRI
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Education Loan Agreement executed by defendants No. 1 and 2, Guarantee Agreement executed by the defendants No. 1 and 3, Statement of Account of Akhil. P. T.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. P. Sasidharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vishnu Narayanan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Lathesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff bank is entitled to realize an amount of ₹53,269 along with interest.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹53,269/- with interest @ 11.25 % per annum, from the date of suit till the date of realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Education Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the education loan agreement executed by defendants No. 1 and 2 in favor of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the guarantee agreement executed by the defendants No. 1 and 3.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document contains the statement of account of Akhil. P. T issued by Canara Bank, detailing the loan amount and transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs AKHIL . P. T et al regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs AKHIL . P. T et al regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala State
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Arathi T.T. regarding recovery of loan amount
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Rajani P. regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Fathima Aslaha E.P. et al regarding recovery of loan
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Smt.Linsha.N.K et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH vs RATHEESH. K regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won