Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 612/2022

Case between Canara Bank, Kozhikode Malaparamba Branch vs Fighter World Aqua Traders, Sheena Kumari regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha T.P
Order Date
2025-12-12
Duration
approximately-5 years 4 months
Case Closed
Fri, 12/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against Fighter World Aqua Traders and Sheena Kumari for the recovery of loans amounting to ₹9,72,445.28. The bank claims that the defendants defaulted on their loan repayments.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendants are directed to pay jointly and severally an amount of ₹9,72,500 to the plaintiff along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants directed to pay jointly and severally ₹9,72,500 along with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendants are directed to pay jointly and severally an amount of ₹9,72,500 to the plaintiff along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff proved the claim of borrowal and default in repayment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff proved the claim of borrowal and default in repayment.
Supporting Evidence
The claim of borrowal and default in repayment of the amount is proved by the affidavit filed by PW1 and Exhibits A1 to A7.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. The defendants are directed to pay jointly and severally an amount of ₹9,72,500 to the plaintiff, along with an interest at the rate of 7% till the date of decree and thereafter 6% till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank, Kozhikode Malaparamba Branch
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fighter World Aqua Traders
Relation
Rep. By
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheena Kumari. M.P
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o Santhosh Kumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Sanction Letter, Letter issued by Plaintiff to Defendant No.1, Cash Credit Agreement, Agreement cum Deed of Hypothecation, Letter of Undertaking, Attested copy of Account Statement, Non Starter Report
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abdul Jaleel Onath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shiji. N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sheeja. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay jointly and severally an amount of 9,72,500/- to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. 1. The defendants are directed to pay jointly and severally an amount of 9,72,500/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Seventy Two Thousand And Five Hundred Only) to the plaintiff, along with an interest at the rate of 7% till the date of decree and thereafter 6% till realisation.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay the cost of the suit to the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
The defendants are directed to pay jointly and severally the cost of the suit to the plaintiffs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff used this document to prove the grant of loan to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter issued by Plaintiff to Defendant No.1
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter was referred to in connection with the terms of loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the terms for the cash credit facility availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the hypothecation of assets as security for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter confirms the undertaking regarding the loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Attested copy of Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is used to support the amounts owed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Non Starter Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This report may be linked to the performance of the loan or business post-approval.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank, Kozhikode Malaparamba Branch vs Fighter World Aqua Traders, Sheena Kumari regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank, Kozhikode Malaparamba Branch vs Fighter World Aqua Traders, Sheena Kumari regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 08/21/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 12/12/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S Cut Man Gents Beauty Parlour et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Bank et al vs M/s. A J Advisory Services et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank Peruvayal Branch vs Sri.Mohanan.K.K regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Samson @ Louis Samsom regarding loan repayment
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Mr Fahad Rahman P P et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won