Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 94/2022

Case between C Vasu et al vs TK Jayarajan regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Judge
Smt Meera John K
Order Date
2025-08-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, including C Vasu, Gopika Radhakrishnan, Pradeesh, and Radhika Sreejith, are involved in a rent control petition against the respondent TK Jayarajan. The court has accepted the mediation report and allowed the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the mediation report and allowed the petition as per the terms of the report.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the mediation report and allowed the petition as per the terms of the report.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation report were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation report were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation report are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the same is accepted. Petition is allowed in terms of mediation report.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C Vasu
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopika Radhakrishnan
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pradeesh
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Radhika Sreejith
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
TK Jayarajan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. NVP Rafeeque
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.KB Sivaramakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition is allowed in terms of mediation report.
Evidence:
Hence, the same is accepted. Petition is allowed in terms of mediation report.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court accepted the mediation report which outlines the terms agreed by the parties.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C Vasu et al vs TK Jayarajan regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between C Vasu et al vs TK Jayarajan regarding Rent Control Petition

Quick Facts

Location
KOZHIKODE
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Othandavida Vayalil Ahammed Haji et al vs Kousalya et al regarding Rent Recovery
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Abdul Basheer.A.K et al vs Abdul Sathar regarding delivery of possession.
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Rabiya vs IK Krishnadas et al regarding rent control
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Prajena P.V. vs Subhashini V.P. regarding Rent Control
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Bayaram Veettil Ummayabi et al vs T.V. Zeenath et al regarding Rent Control
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Plaintiff Won