Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 559/2022

Case between Beeran Kutty vs S. Sunil Kumar regarding mandatory injunction and arrears of licence fee

Court
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Jomy Anu Isaac
Order Date
2025-03-03
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 03/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Beeran Kutty, is seeking a mandatory injunction to evict the defendant, S. Sunil Kumar, from the property due to non-payment of license fees and damages for unauthorized occupation. The defendant was declared ex parte as he did not file a written statement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed, ordering the defendant to vacate the property and pay arrears as well as damages.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory injunction to vacate the property, Rs.16,000 as arrears of license fee, and damages of Rs.2,000 per month for unauthorized use.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed, ordering the defendant to vacate the property and pay arrears as well as damages.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff proves the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff proves the case of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: - 1. Defendant is directed by way of mandatory injunction to vacate the plaint schedule property and put plaintiff in possession of the said property within two months from this date...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Beeran Kutty
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S. Sunil Kumar
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Lawyer notice issued terminating the license arrangement, postal receipt, acknowledgment card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Faisal.P. Mukkam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G. Manohar lal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Pratheesh.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to vacate the plaint schedule property and put plaintiff in possession of the said property within two months.
Evidence:
Defendant is directed by way of mandatory injunction to vacate the plaint schedule property and put plaintiff in possession of the said property within two months from this date, failing which plaintiff can get the defendant evicted from the said property through the process of this court at the costs of the defendant.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise Rs.16,000/- as arrears of license fee together with 9% interest per annum till realisation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise Rs.16,000/- (Rupees Sixteen Thousand Only) as arrears of license fee together with 9% interest per annum till realisation.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise Rs.2,000/- per month as damages for unauthorized use and occupation from 1/7/2022 together with 9% interest.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand Only) per month as damages for the unauthorized use and occupation from 1/7/2022 together with 9% interest till date of vacating.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice was issued to terminate the license arrangement, and its postal receipt and acknowledgment card show it was received by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Beeran Kutty vs S. Sunil Kumar regarding mandatory injunction and arrears of licence fee
Case Code Year
Case between Beeran Kutty vs S. Sunil Kumar regarding mandatory injunction and arrears of licence fee

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sat, 10/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 03/03/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.K.Chidanand vs Shahabas regarding mandatory injunction and licence fee arrears.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr.Brijosh.K vs P.K.Gireesh regarding mandatory injunction and other connected reliefs.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Valappil Abdurahiman vs Maliyekkal Fasil regarding mandatory injunction and arrears of license fee
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited et al vs Abdul Nazar.P regarding mandatory injunction and damages.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.V.Abu Faizal vs Smt.Saajitha.T regarding realisation of arrears of rent
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won