Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1240/2024

Case between Bank of Maharashtra vs Syammohan M.N regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-11-05
Duration
approximately-7 years 4 months
Case Code No.
1240
Case Closed
Wed, 11/05/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Bank of Maharashtra, is seeking to recover an outstanding loan amount from the defendant, Syammohan M.N, who has defaulted on repayments. The defendant failed to appear in court, resulting in the proceedings being conducted ex-parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest and costs from the defendant's assets.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹1,18,921/- with 6% interest from the date of the suit till date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest and costs from the defendant's assets.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient evidence from the plaintiff that the defendant had defaulted on the loan repayment obligations.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient evidence from the plaintiff that the defendant had defaulted on the loan repayment obligations.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence presented by PW1 prove that an amount of ₹1,18,921/- is due from the defendant. The documents produced by the plaintiff show that the defendant is liable to pay this amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 1,18,921₹/- (Rupees One Lakh Eighteen Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty-One only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit till date of realization from the defendants and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Maharashtra
Party Age
36
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Syammohan M.N
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan application, Original statement of account, Original agreement for the term loan, True copy of the lawyer’s notice, Sanction letter, Original demand promissory note
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.S.V.Sreeja
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount due from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a)The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 1,18,921/- (Rupees One Lakh Eighteen Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty-One only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit till date of realization from the defendants and his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
b) The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as evidence to prove the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Statement Of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show the payment history and outstanding balance.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Agreement for the term loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document detailed the terms of the loan agreement signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: True copy of the lawyer’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This was a legal notice sent to the defendant demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirmed the approval of the loan to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was an official acknowledgment of the loan agreement obligations.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 06/30/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 11/05/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won