Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 665/2022

Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Manikandan. A regarding realization of money

Court
THE MUNSIFF-II COURT, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha T.P
Order Date
2025-07-21
Duration
approximately-2 years 7 months 5 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Bank of Baroda seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendant, Manikandan. A, who defaulted on repayment. The court found in favor of the plaintiff after the defendant failed to appear.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendant to pay Rs.3,45,200/- to the plaintiff with specified interest rates. The defendant is also ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay Rs.3,45,200/- with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendant to pay Rs.3,45,200/- to the plaintiff with specified interest rates. The defendant is also ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the claim of borrowing and default through unchallenged evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved the claim of borrowing and default through unchallenged evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The claim of the plaintiff as to interest is exorbitant. The plaintiff is entitled to get a decree accordingly.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1 The defendant is directed to pay Rs.3,45,200/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Forty Five Thousand And Two Hundred Only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 7% per annum from the date of the decree and thereafter 6% per annum till the date of realization. 2 The defendant is also directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda, Main Branch, Holiday City Centre, Bank Road, Kasaba amsom, Kalathinkunnu desom, Calicut- 673001
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Manu. M.P
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o K. Madhava Kurup
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manikandan. A
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o Raman Nair. K
Plaintiffs Documents
Undertaking, Instrument of Hypothecation of Vehicles, Letter of Installment with Acceleration Clause, The Demand Promissory Note, Letter of Acknowledgment of debt.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul Jaleel Onath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Shiji. N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay Rs.3,45,200/- to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.3,45,200/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Forty Five Thousand And Two Hundred Only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 7% per annum from the date of the decree and thereafter 6% per annum till the date of realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document relates to the borrowal and terms between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Instrument of Hypothecation of Vehicles
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the hypothecation of the vehicle as security for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of installment with acceleration clause
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the installment payment terms to ensure repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: The Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Represents the formal promise of the defendant to pay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: The letter of Acknowledgment of debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledges the debts owed by the defendant to the plaintiff over several dates.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Attested copy of the statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides a detailed account of the outstanding loan as of the relevant dates.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Manikandan. A regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Manikandan. A regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Thu, 07/21/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S Cut Man Gents Beauty Parlour et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Bank et al vs M/s. A J Advisory Services et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank Peruvayal Branch vs Sri.Mohanan.K.K regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Samson @ Louis Samsom regarding loan repayment
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Mr Fahad Rahman P P et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won