RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 120/2022

Case between Association for Welfare of the Handicapped et al vs Usharathnam Pakkaath et al regarding Rent Control Petition.

Court

RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE

Judge

Smt. Shabeena M.

Order Date

2025-03-03

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the Association for Welfare of the Handicapped represented by Sri. T.V. Mammootty as the petitioner against Usharathnam Pakkaath, Sareena K., and Nishad S.M. as respondents regarding a rent dispute. The court dismissed the petition for default following a lack of representation from the respondents.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the petition due to default as the petitioner was not present and no evidence was adduced.

Key Reasoning:
Not applicable

Why Defendant Won:
Not applicable

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence IA 1/2025 dismissed. RCP dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Association for Welfare of the Handicapped
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Usharathnam Pakkaath
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sareena K.
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Nishad S.M.
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Sabi
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. P. Lyvins
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

IA 1/2025 filed for removal of case from the list again.

Evidence:

Hence IA 1/2025 dismissed.