Case Summary
The plaintiff Arun Lal .S filed a suit against M/s Bharathi Mineral Private Ltd and its director for an undisclosed matter. The court dismissed the suit for default as both parties were absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of both parties. There was no representation made before the court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Arun Lal .S
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Bharathi Mineral Private Ltd
- Relation
- represented by its Managing Director Mr.Sankar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayasankar Sujaya Babu
- Relation
- Director
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S. Balachandran Kulasekharam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Sarada Devi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to both sides being absent.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Arun Lal .S vs M/s Bharathi Mineral Private Ltd et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Arun Lal .S vs M/s Bharathi Mineral Private Ltd et al regarding suit dismissal for default.