| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4541 - 4545 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Anisha Nair G.S vs Suja Sreekumar et al regarding withdrawal from the suit

OS. No.275/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shanavas et al vs M.K. Nazeer et al regarding maintainability of suit

Civil Suit

OS.No.133/2022

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-06-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between CSB Bank vs Franklinraj.D et al regarding sale by equitable mortgage.

Civil Suit

O.S.No.392/2020

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-18

approximately-4 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Gopika Ajith vs Nair Sathesh regarding dismissal for default

OS. No.1364/2021

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-18

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Senior Manager, Canara Bank vs Balabinu.B regarding plaint rejection

Civil Suit

OS. No.1990/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-18

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Necessary Fees

Plenty of petitions were dismissed due to failure to pay batta or other essential fees.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Several cases failed because the plaintiffs did not provide adequate evidence to substantiate their claims.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Petitions were frequently dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking necessary procedural steps in their cases.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

A significant number of dismissals occurred because the petitioners failed to appear in court when required.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Necessary Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?