Case Summary
The plaintiffs, including Shanavas and Peyadu Muslim Jama Ath, failed to appear for the hearing. The defendants were represented and the court found the suit to be not maintainable.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was found to be not maintainable and the plaint was rejected. The plaintiffs were absent and the defendants were represented.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was found not maintainable before this court.
The suit was found not maintainable before this court.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was found not maintainable before this court.
The suit was found not maintainable before this court.
Supporting Evidence
The court determined that the suit was not maintainable based on the applicable rules of civil procedure.
Judgment Evidence:
IA 3/23 is allowed vide separate order by finding that suit is not maintainable before this court and plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shanavas
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- null
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Peyadu Muslim Jama Ath
- Relation
- null
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M.K. Nazeer
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Maheen
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Poonthura Tharif B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Muhamad Shah. M. K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Abhilash. N. G. S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022