| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4106 - 4110 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between C.T. John @ John Chengazhath Thomas vs P. Sreedevi Nair et al regarding rectification of instrument

Civil Suit

OS No.109/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-08-23

approximately-2 years 4 months 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Marykutty Thomas vs Rosily.R et al regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No 166/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-08-23

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between AjithaKumari vs Anoop.M.R regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S.No.436/2020

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-08-25

approximately-5 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Satheesan.M. vs Gireesan.M. et al regarding compromise agreement

Civil Suit

OS No.18/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-08-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Transport Development Finance Corporation, Ltd. vs The Managing Director, Kerala Co- operative Milk Marketing Federation et al regarding balance court fee

Civil Suit

OS.No.2105/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-08-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs consistently failed to pay required court fees, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to support claims or prove means, resulting in dismissal of petitions.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural actions, such as issuing notices, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during hearings, affecting case outcomes.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?