Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.436/2020

Case between AjithaKumari vs Anoop.M.R regarding realisation of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri. Manesh.S.V
Order Date
2025-08-25
Duration
approximately-5 years 4 months
Case Code No.
436
Case Closed
Mon, 08/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, AjithaKumari, is seeking to recover money from the defendant, Anoop.M.R, related to a property sale agreement that did not materialize. The plaintiff claims compensation and interest after the defendant failed to execute the sale deed as agreed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partly decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, granting her an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- along with interest. However, the claim for additional costs of Rs.1 lakh was declined due to insufficient evidence.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.1,50,000/- together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partly decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, granting her an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- along with interest. However, the claim for additional costs of Rs.1 lakh was declined due to insufficient evidence.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to support her claim regarding the cheque and the non-execution of the sale deed by the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to support her claim regarding the cheque and the non-execution of the sale deed by the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
On appreciating the entire evidence adduced, I am of the view that Ext.A3 cheque was executed by the defendant in respect of a legally existing liability towards PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is partly decreed with costs as follows: The Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
AjithaKumari
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anoop.M.R
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement for sale of property dated 06/04/2019, Agreement for sale of property dated 28/09/2019, Bandhan Bank Cheque No.000030, Dishonour Memo, Copy of Lawyers Notice, Original Postal receipt.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.A. Subramonian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.S Aswakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover an amount based on the dishonoured cheque along with interest.
Evidence:
The Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees one lakh fifty thousand only) together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought compensation for travel expenses incurred for the purpose of executing the sale deed.
Evidence:
There is insufficient evidence before Court to prove her claims in this regard and hence the same stands declined.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement for sale of property
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the initial agreement for the sale of the property between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement for sale of property
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the subsequent agreement made after the initial agreement, including compensation terms.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cheque was issued by the defendant towards the interest accrued on the advance money paid by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Dishonour memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memo indicates that the cheque issued by the defendant was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Lawyers Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent by the plaintiff to the defendant demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of dispatch for the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 03/11/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 08/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sariga JLG et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Meat Hub regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CSB Bank vs Franklinraj.D et al regarding sale by equitable mortgage.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shailaja.A vs Valsala regarding Recovery of money
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sunitha Kumari et al regarding recovery of money
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won