Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No.18/2022

Case between Satheesan.M. vs Gireesan.M. et al regarding compromise agreement

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- RCC
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-08-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Satheesan.M., filed a suit against the defendants Gireesan.M. and Jayanthi.K. regarding a matter that was settled through mediation. The court has decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff as the suit was decreed based on a compromise agreement reached between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff as the suit was decreed based on a compromise agreement reached between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case was settled through a compromise agreement between the parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case was settled through a compromise agreement between the parties.
Supporting Evidence
The mediation report received stating 'settled'.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Satheesan.M.
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gireesan.M.
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayanthi.K.
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Unnikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Swaroop Mohan.C.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M.S. Mahesh Dev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Mediation report received stating “settled”. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Satheesan.M. vs Gireesan.M. et al regarding compromise agreement
Case Code Year
Case between Satheesan.M. vs Gireesan.M. et al regarding compromise agreement

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won