Case Summary
The petitioners Ramesan and Omana sought restoration of a previous order against the respondent Rajeev. The court dismissed the petition after hearing the arguments.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the restoration petition filed by the petitioners.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Therefore RP is also dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ramesan
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Omana
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajeev
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anish Gopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Restoration Petition is dismissed.
Evidence:
IA 1/25 dismissed. Therefore RP is also dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ramesan et al vs Rajeev regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Ramesan et al vs Rajeev regarding restoration petition