Case Summary
Mini Jayakumar is the plaintiff seeking restoration of a petition against the defendants Surendran, Sivan, and Sobhana. The court determined that the petition was not supported by any documentary evidence and dismissed it.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for lack of supporting evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The petition lacked necessary documentary evidence.
The petition lacked necessary documentary evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition lacked necessary documentary evidence.
The petition lacked necessary documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
What prevented the petitioner from communicating his lawyer concerned to submit the matter of his illness was not properly answered by the petitioner. Petition can only be considered as means to delay the procedure.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence IA dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mini Jayakumar
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Surendran
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sivan
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sobhana
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aneesh Gopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mini Jayakumar vs Surendran et al regarding restoration of petition
Case Code Year
Case between Mini Jayakumar vs Surendran et al regarding restoration of petition