Case Summary
The case involves a petition filed by Gopakumar and a deceased co-plaintiff Sukumara Panicker to restore a previously dismissed suit. The court dismissed the petition on grounds of delays and lack of supporting documentation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for restoration due to the petitioner's failure to provide adequate supporting documents and court records showing previous dismissals for default.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed with cost of the respondents.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gopakumar
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- Nephew
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sukumara Panicker (Late)
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chellappa Panicker
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anilkumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Maniyan
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- D.Subhash Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- B.Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Restoration of the suit
Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed with cost of the respondents.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gopakumar et al vs Chellappa Panicker et al regarding restoration of a suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Gopakumar et al vs Chellappa Panicker et al regarding restoration of a suit.