Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No.235 /2018

Case between Babu vs Rajakanthan et al regarding Restoration petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-12-06
Duration
approximately-7 years 11 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Babu is the petitioner seeking restoration of a case. The respondents include Rajakanthan and others, with the petition being related to a case from 2018.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition for restoration was ultimately dismissed by the court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition for restoration was ultimately dismissed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
The reason for dismissal was lack of sufficient grounds from the petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
The reason for dismissal was lack of sufficient grounds from the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Judgment Evidence:

Though respondent had submitted only formal objection considering the fact that the case relates back to the year 2018 and of the reason stated by petitioner that evidence was not adduced at the right time due to the ignorance of law of the counsel, which cannot be considered as a satisfied reason for allowing the petition. Hence I am not inclined to allow the petition.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Babu
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajakanthan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Geetha
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anjali
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Parthan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nandhathmajan
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv.P.M.Baby
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. P.K.Muraleedharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petition was not allowed.
Evidence:
Hence I am not inclined to allow the petition. Therefore the petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Babu vs Rajakanthan et al regarding Restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Babu vs Rajakanthan et al regarding Restoration petition

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Thu, 12/06/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ramesan et al vs Rajeev regarding restoration petition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar et al vs Chellappa Panicker et al regarding restoration of a suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mini Jayakumar vs Surendran et al regarding restoration of petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Shibu vs K V Kasmin et al regarding Restoration petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Ammini vs Maniyappan et al regarding Restoration Petition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won