Private Individual

Decree holders filed a case seeking property delivery, but the petition was dismissed for default due to no steps taken for delivery.

The court oversaw the delivery of property between Varikkapulakkal Abdullakutty alias Abdu Haji (Decree Holder) and Puliyankodath Musthafa (Judgment Debtor). The petition is closed after the property delivery.

Petitioner Parambil Kareem filed a restoration petition against respondent Thayyil Sidheeq, seeking permission to pay costs to avoid dismissal.

Muhammed filed a restoration petition against Jamal Moideen. The court allowed the petition and set aside a previous decree.

Plaintiff Mohamed Haneefa.K, aged 45, filed a case against defendant Arreekkal Ali, also aged 45. The matter was settled between the parties in Lok Adalath, and an award was passed, leading to the closure of the proceedings.

Petitioners filed to set aside a decree and allow restoration, last chance for written statement granted.

The decree sought to be executed was set aside by the court, leading to the closure of the petition.

Plaintiff Gangadharan filed a suit against defendant Ratheesh seeking cancellation of a document. Issue revolved around an alleged consent letter executed by the plaintiff which the defendant claimed as a valid release deed.

The case involves Hense Raj-P1 as the decree holder seeking property delivery from Gladis, the judgment debtor. The court ordered the property to be delivered and closed the petition.

Abdul Azeez, the decree holder, filed a case against K.N. Sulaikhabi and others seeking property delivery, which was granted by the court.