Case Summary
Plaintiff Gangadharan filed a suit against defendant Ratheesh seeking cancellation of a document. Issue revolved around an alleged consent letter executed by the plaintiff which the defendant claimed as a valid release deed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
The suit was dismissed with costs in favor of the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit - Cancellation of Document
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to prove that the document was vitiated by fraud or misrepresentation.
Plaintiff failed to prove that the document was vitiated by fraud or misrepresentation.
Judgment Evidence:
So, the plaintiff failed to prove that Ext.B3 document is vitiated by fraud or misrepresentation.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Gangadharan (49 years)
Payyapande Veedu, Niramaruthur Amsom, Desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Ratheesh (41 years)
Payyapande Veedu, Tirur Amsom, Desom, Peruvazhiyambalam, Pookayil Bazar, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Cancellation of Document
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking cancellation of document No. 4086/2013 of Sub Registrar Office, Tirur
Evidence:
Plaintiff failed to prove that the document was vitiated by fraud or misrepresentation.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified copy of Common Right Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved the existence of the document in question.
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Copy of Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence in the case.
Reference:
A2
Document Type:
Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the matter under consideration.
Reference:
A3
Document Type:
Partition Deed
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Related to property partition involving the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
B1
Document Type:
Common Right Deed
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
The document in question that plaintiff sought to cancel.
Reference:
B3