| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4931 - 4935 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Shibukumar vs Krishnan Nair regarding plaint rejection

Civil Suit

O.S.No.86/2023

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-03-12

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Latha.C vs Abhilash V.P regarding ex-parte decree

Civil Suit

R.P. No. 1374/2023

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-03-14

approximately-2 years 1 month 20 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between D.S Jayachandran et al vs DR Bharath Chandran et al regarding injunction application

Civil Suit

OS.No.1795/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-03-14

approximately-1 year 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jalaja S. et al vs null regarding issuance of succession certificate

Succession

OP(SUCCESSION) No.18/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-03-12

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom et al vs Abdul Rahim@ S. Rahim regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.1900/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-03-14

approximately-3 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs consistently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to prove claims or the financial capacity of respondents resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Failure of plaintiffs to appear for hearings led to dismissals for default and lack of prosecution.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps, resulting in cases being dismissed for default.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioner in Court

No Steps Taken in Case

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?