Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.P. No. 1374/2023

Case between Latha.C vs Abhilash V.P regarding ex-parte decree

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-03-14
Duration
approximately-2 years 1 month 20 days
Case Closed
Fri, 03/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Latha.C is the plaintiff who obtained an ex-parte decree against Abhilash V.P, the defendant. The defendant filed a petition to set aside the ex-parte decree claiming ineffective legal representation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition to set aside the ex-parte decree was allowed by the court based on the ineffective representation by the defendant's previous lawyer. The defendant is required to pay costs to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The ex-parte decree is set aside on the condition of payment of costs of ₹3,000/- to the respondent.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to set aside the ex-parte decree was allowed by the court based on the ineffective representation by the defendant's previous lawyer. The defendant is required to pay costs to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court recognized that the ex-parte decree resulted from the ineffective representation by the defendant's prior counsel.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court recognized that the ex-parte decree resulted from the ineffective representation by the defendant's prior counsel.
Supporting Evidence
The court is inclined to take a lenient view in this case, as the petitioner alleges that the ex parte decree occurred solely due to the actions of their former lawyer.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: The petition is allowed and the ex parte decree passed by this court against the petitioner on 24/01/2023 is set aside on the condition of payment of costs of ₹3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand Only) to the respondent within a period of 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Latha.C
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abhilash V.P
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajeev. T. A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Sonay John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The ex parte decree passed by the court against the petitioner on 24/01/2023 is set aside.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed and the ex parte decree passed by this court against the petitioner on 24/01/2023 is set aside on the condition of payment of costs of ₹3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand Only) to the respondent within a period of 30 days from today.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Latha.C vs Abhilash V.P regarding ex-parte decree
Case Code Year
Case between Latha.C vs Abhilash V.P regarding ex-parte decree

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won