| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12236 - 12240 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Periyangot Lakshmikutty and Karthika vs Ramesh Kumar and Reena regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit - Temporary Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 332 OF 2011

Tirur

2018-12-06

7 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Rahmathulla vs Medammal Rasak Haji regarding restoration petition

Civil - Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 555/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-12-05

0 years, 9 months, 14 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Musthafa vs Kadeeja regarding specific performance

Civil Suit - Specific Performance

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 213 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-12-05

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Markentile Co-operative Society vs Alavi et al regarding debt recovery

Execution Petition

EP 66/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-12-05

0 years, 9 months, 3 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Parambatt Sameer et al vs Abdul Kareem et al regarding dishonoured cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:25/2018

Tirur

2018-12-05

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed for failure to pay the required batta fees for proceeding with the case.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Petitions were frequently dismissed due to insufficient evidence demonstrating respondents' financial capacity or means.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Numerous dismissals occurred because plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps such as issuing notices.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were often dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?