| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12216 - 12220 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s Kains Associates vs Reji Proprietor Gracious Appliances regarding dishonoured cheque

Criminal Case - Dishonoured Cheque under Section 138 N.I. Act

S.T. No:138/2017

Tirur

2018-12-15

2 years (from refiled date in 2016)

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The South Indian Bank Ltd. vs Mas Pharmaceuticals et al regarding money

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 59 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-12-14

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary Kottakkal Service Co-operatice Bank Ltd. vs Hamsa et al regarding decree satisfaction

Execution Proceedings

EP 5/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-12-14

0 years, 11 months, 24 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Thennal Service Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sharafudheen regarding debt recovery

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 153/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-12-14

0 years, 5 months, 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kakkadavath Leela vs T.V. Rubeena regarding decree execution

Execution Proceedings

EP 205/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-12-14

0 years, 2 months, 20 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed for failure to pay the required batta fees for proceeding with the case.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Petitions were frequently dismissed due to insufficient evidence demonstrating respondents' financial capacity or means.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Numerous dismissals occurred because plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps such as issuing notices.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were often dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?