| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12256 - 12260 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Ayisha et al vs Vattakandi Kumaran regarding right of way

Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 366 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-11-03

Approximately 3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Gangadharan.F P.K et al vs Pulikkal Aramughan et al regarding declaration and injunction

Civil Suit - Declaration and Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 409 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-11-03

4 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Co-operative Bank Limited vs Misvar Paredath et al regarding decree execution

Civil Suit - Execution of Decree

EP 144/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-11-03

0 years, 3 months, 25 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sayyid Alavikoya Thangal and Seethikoya Thangal regarding dishonoured cheque

Criminal Case - N.I. Act

S.T. No:22/2017

Perinthalmanna

2018-11-03

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding lease and rent control

Rent Control - Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 89 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-11-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, resulting in the dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Many dismissals were due to insufficient evidence presented to support the claims made by the plaintiffs.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Petitions were dismissed because plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural actions, such as issuing notices.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Court dismissals often occurred due to the absence of the plaintiff, indicating lack of participation.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of the Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?