Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.308/2022

Case between V.Suresh Kumar et al vs Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd et al regarding Suit dismissal.

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-07-30
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs include V.Suresh Kumar and C.Jayalekshmi. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. No departmental notice was sufficient to prompt the plaintiff's appearance.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. No departmental notice was sufficient to prompt the plaintiff's appearance.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V.Suresh Kumar
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C.Jayalekshmi
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd
Relation
represented by The Chairman/Managing Director
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Authorized Officer,Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Branch Manager, Thiruvananthapuram Branch, Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Udhayakumar, Chief Manager/Authorized Officer, Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kesari Krishnan Nair.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Jobin J Abraham
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Roshan Shah.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sonay John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.G.Mohandas Pai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.R.Gopu Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Parvati.M.Pai
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Evidence:
As Plaintiff was absent and no representation made, department notice was issued. Even inspite of issuance of Department notice, plaintiff not turned up. Hence Suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V.Suresh Kumar et al vs Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd et al regarding Suit dismissal.
Case Code Year
Case between V.Suresh Kumar et al vs Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd et al regarding Suit dismissal.

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
Court of Principal Munsiff
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won