Case Summary
The plaintiff Vinulal B.O was absent during the proceedings, and no representation was made. The court dismissed the suit for default due to lack of action to issue summons to the defendant.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to issue summons to the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and did not take necessary steps in the case.
The plaintiff failed to appear and did not take necessary steps in the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and did not take necessary steps in the case.
The plaintiff failed to appear and did not take necessary steps in the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent, no representation. No steps seen taken to issue summons to the defendant.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vinulal B.O
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Remya.I
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.R. Biju Lal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.R. Shijulal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vinulal B.O vs Remya.I regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Vinulal B.O vs Remya.I regarding dismissal for default