Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.266/2020

Case between Vinod vs K.S. Sasikala regarding abatement of suit

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-02
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vinod, the plaintiff, is no longer alive. The legal representatives are not cooperating with the suit, leading to the suit being abated.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the suit stands abated as Vinod, the plaintiff, is deceased and his legal representatives are not cooperating.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the suit stands abated as Vinod, the plaintiff, is deceased and his legal representatives are not cooperating.
Key Reasoning:
The suit stands abated under Order XXII Rule 3(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure due to the plaintiff's death.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit stands abated under Order XXII Rule 3(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure due to the plaintiff's death.
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel submitted that, the plaintiff is no more. Endorsement also made to that effect. The learned counsel submitted that, the legal representatives are not co-operating with the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Pronounced in the open court on this the 2nd day of June 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vinod
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.S. Sasikala
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.B. Shibu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Ammu V Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Arun. L
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Nithin Raj R.L
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit stands abated under Order XXII Rule 3(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Evidence:
The learned counsel submitted that, the legal representatives are not co-operating with the suit. Hence, the suit stands abated under Order XXII Rule 3(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vinod vs K.S. Sasikala regarding abatement of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Vinod vs K.S. Sasikala regarding abatement of suit

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won