OS. No.392/2012

Case between Vincent Pereira vs Thomas.J.R et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court

COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III

Judge

Smt.Sreelakshmi. C

Order Date

2025-01-27

Duration

Case Closed

Mon, 01/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vincent Pereira filed a suit against Thomas.J.R and others. The court found the plaintiff absent and dismissed the suit for lack of bona fides.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of sufficient reason for continuing the case.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide sufficient cause to continue.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide sufficient cause to continue.

Supporting Evidence

I find no bonafides to continue with to suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Suit stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Vincent Pereira
Party Age: 60
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Thomas.J.R
Party Age: 56
Relation: Son in law of late George Fernandez

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Dr. Molin Mathew
Party Age: 63
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Devid Fernandez
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Christy Figarado
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Sreenivasan Venugopal
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Dileep Sathyan.S
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit stands dismissed due to the Plaintiff's absence and lack of readiness for evidence.

Evidence: