Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.894/2017

Case between Vimala vs Archana regarding declaration of title and other reliefs.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-08-21
Duration
approximately-8 years
Case Closed
Thu, 08/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vimala, the defendant, claims to be the absolute owner of the property originally belonging to her. Archana, the plaintiff, contends she is the rightful owner after her father's death, as he had possessed the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The counter claim is decreed in favor of the counter claim plaintiff, granting permanent prohibitory injunction against the counter claim defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the counter claim defendant from trespassing and other activities.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The counter claim is decreed in favor of the counter claim plaintiff, granting permanent prohibitory injunction against the counter claim defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Counter claim plaintiff proved her title and possession over the property as per documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The documents produced by the counter claim plaintiff also support the case of the counter claim plaintiff. The evidence of the counter claim plaintiff remains unchallenged. There was no contra evidence on record.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the counter claim is decreed as follows: 1) Permanent prohibitory injunction is granted restraining the counter claim defendant from trespassing, from making any form of constructions, from dumping waste, causing any damage or destruction in the counter claim schedule property and from interfering the peaceful enjoyment of the counter claim schedule property by the counter claim plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Archana
Party Age
37
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vimala
Party Age
77
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Partition deed No.2130/1971, Transfer deed No.252/99

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Deepu.U.V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Nowfi.S.M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the counter claim defendant from trespassing and damaging the property.
Evidence:
the counter claim defendant is restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing, from making any form of constructions, from dumping waste, causing any damage or destruction in the counter claim schedule property
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Counter claim plaintiff is entitled to realize costs from the counter claim defendant.
Evidence:
the counter claim plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the counter claim defendant and her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The document establishes the ownership and partition of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Transfer Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The document confirms the transfer of property rights relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Oral evidence was provided by DW1 supporting the counter claim plaintiff's ownership.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vimala vs Archana regarding declaration of title and other reliefs.
Case Code Year
Case between Vimala vs Archana regarding declaration of title and other reliefs.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 08/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won