Case Summary
The plaintiffs, led by Vilasini, filed a suit against the defendants, including Jeeva dharma Charitable Trust, intending to seek relief. The case was ultimately dismissed by the court due to the plaintiffs' failure to appear and present evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence presentation. The plaintiff had multiple opportunities to amend the plaint but failed to do so.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the plaintiff was not present to adduce evidence and thus dismissed the case.
The court determined that the plaintiff was not present to adduce evidence and thus dismissed the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The suit was posted for multiple dates for trial, and the plaintiffs did not take adequate action to proceed with their case.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, this court is of the view that, the intention of the plaintiff is only to remove the case from the list. Today, the plaintiff is also not present before the court. Since, the plaintiff is not present and ready to adduce evidence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vilasini
- Party Age
- 83
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Uma Devi
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ajith Kumar
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Biju
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sreeja
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jeeva dharma Charitable Trust
- Relation
- represented by its Settler/Author
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajeev Kumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Village Officer
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S. Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sateesa Chandran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.S. Bhasurendran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Prasanth Pai
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of readiness to adduce evidence.
Evidence:
Hence, this court is of the view that, the intention of the plaintiff is only to remove the case from the list. Today, the plaintiff is also not present before the court. Since, the plaintiff is not present and ready to adduce evidence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vilasini et al vs Jeeva dharma Charitable Trust et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Vilasini et al vs Jeeva dharma Charitable Trust et al regarding dismissal for default.