Case Summary
Vijayakumari. V filed a suit against Udayakala. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings.
The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings.
The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings.
Judgment Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vijayakumari. V
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Udayakala
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Lakshmi. L
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Kanjiramattom T.K. Siraj
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023