Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1289/2020

Case between Vasundhara Devi.L et al vs T.V. Lekshmikanthan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-07-30
Duration
approximately-4 years 8 months
Case Code No.
1289
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Vasundhara Devi and her daughter Lekshmi, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants regarding the assets of the late Sri. T.V. Ramakrishnan Potti. The case involves the distribution of the deceased's savings and the nominees appointed by him for various accounts.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court partly decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs by restraining the second defendant from disbursing the deceased's funds to the first defendant without following due process of law.
Judgment Favored
Partial
Relief Granted
Let the 2nd defendant be perpetually restrained from disbursing the money held in deposits or savings accounts or any such money left by the late Sri. T.V. Ramakrishna Potti held on deposit with the 2nd defendant other than through due process of Law and in accordance with Banking Rules and Regulations.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partly decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs by restraining the second defendant from disbursing the deceased's funds to the first defendant without following due process of law.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case demonstrating their legal entitlement to the assets left behind by the deceased.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case demonstrating their legal entitlement to the assets left behind by the deceased.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs have established a prima facie case by demonstrating that they are the legal heirs of the deceased and have a lawful claim over the assets left behind by him.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is partly decreed as follows: (1)Let the 2nd defendant be perpetually restrained from disbursing the money held in deposits or savings accounts or any such money left by the late Sri. T.V. Ramakrishna Potti held on deposit with the 2nd defendant other than through due process of Law and in accordance with Banking Rules and Regulations.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vasundhara Devi.L
Party Age
71
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lekshmi. V
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.V. Lekshmikanthan
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Post Master
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Death Certificate of T.V. Ramakrishnan Potti, Original Savings Bank Pass Book of T.V.Ramakrishnan Potti
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Nair Ajay Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vishnu.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the 2nd defendant from disbursing the money held in the name of the deceased contrary to the law.
Evidence:
this Court finds it appropriate to issue a limited injunction restraining the 2nd defendant from disbursing the money held in the name of the deceased, Sri T.V. Ramakrishna Potti, contrary to any law for the time being in force.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original death certificate of Sri.T.V.Ramakrishnan Potti was marked to support the claim of the plaintiffs as legal heirs.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Savings Bank Pass Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original savings bank pass book of late Sri.T.V.Ramakrishnan Potti was marked to provide evidence of the financial accounts related to the deceased.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 11/11/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won