Case Summary
Vani, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Veena and Sarathlal, the defendants. The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vani
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Veena
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sarathlal
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A.Udayarekha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit stands dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Suit stands dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vani vs Veena et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Vani vs Veena et al regarding dismissal of suit