Case Summary
Vallayil Aramughan filed a suit against Koyapurath Bijith. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of filing necessary affidavits.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not represented in court.
The plaintiff was not represented in court.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not represented in court.
The plaintiff was not represented in court.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff not represented.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vallayil Aramughan
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Koyapurath Bijith
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.P. Regha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.B.Sahsranaman & Ifthikar Malik
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vallayil Aramughan vs Koyapurath Bijith regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Vallayil Aramughan vs Koyapurath Bijith regarding suit dismissal for default