Case Summary
Sathyan.K is the plaintiff and Rafeeque pilakkil is the defendant. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff not being represented and no steps taken for issuance of summons to the defendant.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to non-representation of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to represent and take necessary steps, leading to dismissal.
The plaintiff failed to represent and take necessary steps, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to represent and take necessary steps, leading to dismissal.
The plaintiff failed to represent and take necessary steps, leading to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff not represented. Steps not taken for issuance of summons to defendant.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sathyan.K
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rafeeque pilakkil
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.K. Dharmaraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sathyan.K vs Rafeeque pilakkil regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Sathyan.K vs Rafeeque pilakkil regarding dismissal for default.