Case Summary
Uthaman and Roopa are the plaintiffs while Abdul Muhaimin and Sahil are the defendants. The suit has been dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent and not represented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs failed to appear or represent their case in court.
Plaintiffs failed to appear or represent their case in court.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs failed to appear or represent their case in court.
Plaintiffs failed to appear or represent their case in court.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiffs absent not represented.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Uthaman
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Roopa
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Muhaimin
- Party Age
- 60
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sahil
- Party Age
- 55
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. Asokan Pazhur
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C. Radhakrishnan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V. Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.P. Gangadharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Uthaman vs Abdul Muhaimin regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Uthaman vs Abdul Muhaimin regarding dismissal for default.