Case Summary
The case involved the Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and P. Ashok Kumar as the defendant. The plaintiff was absent and did not take steps to represent the case, leading to its dismissal for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. Consequently, no further actions will be taken against the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is neither present nor represented, after repeated calling of the case.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank of India
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P. Ashok Kumar
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. R. Jagadish Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Hari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs P. Ashok Kumar regarding suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs P. Ashok Kumar regarding suit dismissal