Case Summary
The case involves Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Neenu Sreekumar and others as defendants. The plaintiff filed a memo stating they are not pressing the suit, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's memo to not press the suit resulted in its dismissal. The court ordered no costs.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff chose not to proceed with the suit.
The plaintiff chose not to proceed with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff chose not to proceed with the suit.
The plaintiff chose not to proceed with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff filed not press memo.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Neenu Sreekumar
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreekala.S
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Neethu Satheesh
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. R. Jagadish Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff filed not press memo. Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023