Case Summary
The Union Bank of India represented by its Branch Manager has filed a suit concerning the execution of an award. Both parties were present, and the case was finally heard and closed on the same day.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court acknowledged the representation of both parties and noted that a withdrawal memo had been filed. The court subsequently closed the case after the award was already passed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case was closed due to a filed withdrawal memo and an already passed award.
The case was closed due to a filed withdrawal memo and an already passed award.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court acknowledged the withdrawal memo and the already passed award, thereby closing the case.
Judgment Evidence:
Both parties represented. Withdrawal memo filed. Award already passed. Hence case closed. Pronounced in the open court on this the 30th day of May 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank Of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arya.P.G
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Geetha.A.G
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.R.Jagadish Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Sabu.N.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023