OS. No.2120/2023

Case between Union Bank of India vs Arya S.G et al regarding plaint rejection

Court

COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF

Judge

Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S

Order Date

2025-07-25

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Arya S.G and Sasidharan.C as defendants. The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of the plaintiff and failure to remit the court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court rejected the plaint because the plaintiff was absent and did not remit the court fee.

Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

No Balance Court Fee seen remitted. No application seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the plaint rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Union Bank of India
Relation: represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Arya S.G
Party Age: 27
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sasidharan.C
Party Age: 62
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. M. Balachandran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. T. Saji
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. S.Balachandran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The plaint was rejected due to no balance court fee remitted and no application filed.

Evidence:

hence, the plaint rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification