Case Summary
The plaintiff, Union Bank Of India, represented by its Branch Manager, filed a suit against the defendants Aneesh.B, L.Baburaj, and Selvaraj regarding the non-remittance of the balance court fee. The court heard the case and delivered its judgment on March 6, 2025.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the non-remittance of the balance court fee by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to remit the necessary court fee.
The plaintiff failed to remit the necessary court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to remit the necessary court fee.
The plaintiff failed to remit the necessary court fee.
Supporting Evidence
Balance court fee not remitted.
Judgment Evidence:
Plaint is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank Of India
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aneesh.B
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- L.Baburaj
- Party Age
- 80
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Selvaraj
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.R.Jagadish Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.Balachandran
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Jayasree.S.V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Plaint is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023