Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1764/2022

Case between Union Bank of India vs Anantharaj.S.P et al regarding non remittance of court fee.

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-03-10
Duration
Case Code No.
1764
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India, represented by its Chief Manager, filed a suit against Anantharaj.S.P and others. The court rejected the plaintiff's case due to the non-remittance of balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff's case was rejected due to non-remittance of court fees, resulting in an unfavorable outcome for the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's case was rejected due to non-remittance of court fees, resulting in an unfavorable outcome for the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee, which is a procedural requirement for proceeding with the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee, which is a procedural requirement for proceeding with the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint is rejected for non remittance of balance court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

The court delivered the judgment rejecting the plaint for non remittance of balance court fee.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anantharaj.S.P
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
J.Somarajan Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pushpalatha.S
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. R. Jagadish Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Kokila Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Merin Ann Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint is rejected for non remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Plaint is rejected for non remittance of balance court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
Court of Principal Munsiff
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won