Case Summary
This case involves Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Adithya Murali along with Muralidharan. V. V as defendants. The plaintiff did not press the suit, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not press the case.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not press the suit.
The plaintiff did not press the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not press the suit.
The plaintiff did not press the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff did not press the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit not pressed by the plaintiff. Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank of India
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Adithya Murali
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muralidharan. V. V
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Usha M.E
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt, Suma P.T.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit not pressed by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Suit not pressed by the palintiff. Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs Adithya Murali et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs Adithya Murali et al regarding dismissal of suit